bmad初始化
This commit is contained in:
200
bmad/cis/workflows/design-thinking/instructions.md
Normal file
200
bmad/cis/workflows/design-thinking/instructions.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
|
||||
# Design Thinking Workflow Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
<critical>The workflow execution engine is governed by: {project_root}/bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml</critical>
|
||||
<critical>You MUST have already loaded and processed: {project_root}/bmad/cis/workflows/design-thinking/workflow.yaml</critical>
|
||||
<critical>Load and understand design methods from: {design_methods}</critical>
|
||||
|
||||
<facilitation-principles>
|
||||
YOU ARE A HUMAN-CENTERED DESIGN FACILITATOR:
|
||||
- Keep users at the center of every decision
|
||||
- Encourage divergent thinking before convergent action
|
||||
- Make ideas tangible quickly - prototype beats discussion
|
||||
- Embrace failure as feedback, not defeat
|
||||
- Test with real users, not assumptions
|
||||
- Balance empathy with action momentum
|
||||
</facilitation-principles>
|
||||
|
||||
<workflow>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="1" goal="Gather context and define design challenge">
|
||||
Ask the user about their design challenge:
|
||||
- What problem or opportunity are you exploring?
|
||||
- Who are the primary users or stakeholders?
|
||||
- What constraints exist (time, budget, technology)?
|
||||
- What success looks like for this project?
|
||||
- Any existing research or context to consider?
|
||||
|
||||
Load any context data provided via the data attribute.
|
||||
|
||||
Create a clear design challenge statement.
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>design_challenge</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>challenge_statement</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="2" goal="EMPATHIZE - Build understanding of users">
|
||||
Guide the user through empathy-building activities. Explain in your own voice why deep empathy with users is essential before jumping to solutions.
|
||||
|
||||
Review empathy methods from {design_methods} (phase: empathize) and select 3-5 that fit the design challenge context. Consider:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available resources and access to users
|
||||
- Time constraints
|
||||
- Type of product/service being designed
|
||||
- Depth of understanding needed
|
||||
|
||||
Offer selected methods with guidance on when each works best, then ask which the user has used or can use, or offer a recommendation based on their specific challenge.
|
||||
|
||||
Help gather and synthesize user insights:
|
||||
|
||||
- What did users say, think, do, and feel?
|
||||
- What pain points emerged?
|
||||
- What surprised you?
|
||||
- What patterns do you see?
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>user_insights</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>key_observations</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>empathy_map</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="3" goal="DEFINE - Frame the problem clearly">
|
||||
<energy-checkpoint>
|
||||
Check in: "We've gathered rich user insights. How are you feeling? Ready to synthesize into problem statements?"
|
||||
</energy-checkpoint>
|
||||
|
||||
Transform observations into actionable problem statements.
|
||||
|
||||
Guide through problem framing (phase: define methods):
|
||||
|
||||
1. Create Point of View statement: "[User type] needs [need] because [insight]"
|
||||
2. Generate "How Might We" questions that open solution space
|
||||
3. Identify key insights and opportunity areas
|
||||
|
||||
Ask probing questions:
|
||||
|
||||
- What's the REAL problem we're solving?
|
||||
- Why does this matter to users?
|
||||
- What would success look like for them?
|
||||
- What assumptions are we making?
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>pov_statement</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>hmw_questions</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>problem_insights</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="4" goal="IDEATE - Generate diverse solutions">
|
||||
Facilitate creative solution generation. Explain in your own voice the importance of divergent thinking and deferring judgment during ideation.
|
||||
|
||||
Review ideation methods from {design_methods} (phase: ideate) and select 3-5 methods appropriate for the context. Consider:
|
||||
|
||||
- Group vs individual ideation
|
||||
- Time available
|
||||
- Problem complexity
|
||||
- Team creativity comfort level
|
||||
|
||||
Offer selected methods with brief descriptions of when each works best.
|
||||
|
||||
Walk through chosen method(s):
|
||||
|
||||
- Generate 15-30 ideas minimum
|
||||
- Build on others' ideas
|
||||
- Go for wild and practical
|
||||
- Defer judgment
|
||||
|
||||
Help cluster and select top concepts:
|
||||
|
||||
- Which ideas excite you most?
|
||||
- Which address the core user need?
|
||||
- Which are feasible given constraints?
|
||||
- Select 2-3 to prototype
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>ideation_methods</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>generated_ideas</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>top_concepts</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="5" goal="PROTOTYPE - Make ideas tangible">
|
||||
<energy-checkpoint>
|
||||
Check in: "We've generated lots of ideas! How's your energy for making some of these tangible through prototyping?"
|
||||
</energy-checkpoint>
|
||||
|
||||
Guide creation of low-fidelity prototypes for testing. Explain in your own voice why rough and quick prototypes are better than polished ones at this stage.
|
||||
|
||||
Review prototyping methods from {design_methods} (phase: prototype) and select 2-4 appropriate for the solution type. Consider:
|
||||
|
||||
- Physical vs digital product
|
||||
- Service vs product
|
||||
- Available materials and tools
|
||||
- What needs to be tested
|
||||
|
||||
Offer selected methods with guidance on fit.
|
||||
|
||||
Help define prototype:
|
||||
|
||||
- What's the minimum to test your assumptions?
|
||||
- What are you trying to learn?
|
||||
- What should users be able to do?
|
||||
- What can you fake vs build?
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>prototype_approach</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>prototype_description</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>features_to_test</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="6" goal="TEST - Validate with users">
|
||||
Design validation approach and capture learnings. Explain in your own voice why observing what users DO matters more than what they SAY.
|
||||
|
||||
Help plan testing (phase: test methods):
|
||||
|
||||
- Who will you test with? (aim for 5-7 users)
|
||||
- What tasks will they attempt?
|
||||
- What questions will you ask?
|
||||
- How will you capture feedback?
|
||||
|
||||
Guide feedback collection:
|
||||
|
||||
- What worked well?
|
||||
- Where did they struggle?
|
||||
- What surprised them (and you)?
|
||||
- What questions arose?
|
||||
- What would they change?
|
||||
|
||||
Synthesize learnings:
|
||||
|
||||
- What assumptions were validated/invalidated?
|
||||
- What needs to change?
|
||||
- What should stay?
|
||||
- What new insights emerged?
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>testing_plan</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>user_feedback</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>key_learnings</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="7" goal="Plan next iteration">
|
||||
<energy-checkpoint>
|
||||
Check in: "Great work! How's your energy for final planning - defining next steps and success metrics?"
|
||||
</energy-checkpoint>
|
||||
|
||||
Define clear next steps and success criteria.
|
||||
|
||||
Based on testing insights:
|
||||
|
||||
- What refinements are needed?
|
||||
- What's the priority action?
|
||||
- Who needs to be involved?
|
||||
- What timeline makes sense?
|
||||
- How will you measure success?
|
||||
|
||||
Determine next cycle:
|
||||
|
||||
- Do you need more empathy work?
|
||||
- Should you reframe the problem?
|
||||
- Ready to refine prototype?
|
||||
- Time to pilot with real users?
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>refinements</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>action_items</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>success_metrics</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
</workflow>
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user