197 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			197 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
# Contributing
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Thank you for your interest in go-toml! We appreciate you considering
 | 
						||
contributing to go-toml!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The main goal is the project is to provide an easy-to-use and efficient TOML
 | 
						||
implementation for Go that gets the job done and gets out of your way – dealing
 | 
						||
with TOML is probably not the central piece of your project.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
As the single maintainer of go-toml, time is scarce. All help, big or small, is
 | 
						||
more than welcomed!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## Ask questions
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Any question you may have, somebody else might have it too. Always feel free to
 | 
						||
ask them on the [discussion board][discussions]. We will try to answer them as
 | 
						||
clearly and quickly as possible, time permitting.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Asking questions also helps us identify areas where the documentation needs
 | 
						||
improvement, or new features that weren't envisioned before. Sometimes, a
 | 
						||
seemingly innocent question leads to the fix of a bug. Don't hesitate and ask
 | 
						||
away!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
[discussions]: https://github.com/pelletier/go-toml/discussions
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## Improve the documentation
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The best way to share your knowledge and experience with go-toml is to improve
 | 
						||
the documentation. Fix a typo, clarify an interface, add an example, anything
 | 
						||
goes!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The documentation is present in the [README][readme] and thorough the source
 | 
						||
code. On release, it gets updated on [pkg.go.dev][pkg.go.dev]. To make a change
 | 
						||
to the documentation, create a pull request with your proposed changes. For
 | 
						||
simple changes like that, the easiest way to go is probably the "Fork this
 | 
						||
project and edit the file" button on Github, displayed at the top right of the
 | 
						||
file. Unless it's a trivial change (for example a typo), provide a little bit of
 | 
						||
context in your pull request description or commit message.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## Report a bug
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Found a bug! Sorry to hear that :(. Help us and other track them down and fix by
 | 
						||
reporting it. [File a new bug report][bug-report] on the [issues
 | 
						||
tracker][issues-tracker]. The template should provide enough guidance on what to
 | 
						||
include. When in doubt: add more details! By reducing ambiguity and providing
 | 
						||
more information, it decreases back and forth and saves everyone time.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## Code changes
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Want to contribute a patch? Very happy to hear that!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
First, some high-level rules:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
- A short proposal with some POC code is better than a lengthy piece of text
 | 
						||
  with no code. Code speaks louder than words. That being said, bigger changes
 | 
						||
  should probably start with a [discussion][discussions].
 | 
						||
- No backward-incompatible patch will be accepted unless discussed. Sometimes
 | 
						||
  it's hard, but we try not to break people's programs unless we absolutely have
 | 
						||
  to.
 | 
						||
- If you are writing a new feature or extending an existing one, make sure to
 | 
						||
  write some documentation.
 | 
						||
- Bug fixes need to be accompanied with regression tests.
 | 
						||
- New code needs to be tested.
 | 
						||
- Your commit messages need to explain why the change is needed, even if already
 | 
						||
  included in the PR description.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It does sound like a lot, but those best practices are here to save time overall
 | 
						||
and continuously improve the quality of the project, which is something everyone
 | 
						||
benefits from.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### Get started
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
The fairly standard code contribution process looks like that:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
1. [Fork the project][fork].
 | 
						||
2. Make your changes, commit on any branch you like.
 | 
						||
3. [Open up a pull request][pull-request]
 | 
						||
4. Review, potential ask for changes.
 | 
						||
5. Merge.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Feel free to ask for help! You can create draft pull requests to gather
 | 
						||
some early feedback!
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### Run the tests
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
You can run tests for go-toml using Go's test tool: `go test -race ./...`.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
During the pull request process, all tests will be ran on Linux, Windows, and
 | 
						||
MacOS on the last two versions of Go.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
However, given GitHub's new policy to _not_ run Actions on pull requests until a
 | 
						||
maintainer clicks on button, it is highly recommended that you run them locally
 | 
						||
as you make changes.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### Check coverage
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
We use `go tool cover` to compute test coverage. Most code editors have a way to
 | 
						||
run and display code coverage, but at the end of the day, we do this:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
go test -covermode=atomic -coverprofile=coverage.out
 | 
						||
go tool cover -func=coverage.out
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
and verify that the overall percentage of tested code does not go down. This is
 | 
						||
a requirement. As a rule of thumb, all lines of code touched by your changes
 | 
						||
should be covered. On Unix you can use `./ci.sh coverage -d v2` to check if your
 | 
						||
code lowers the coverage.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### Verify performance
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Go-toml aims to stay efficient. We rely on a set of scenarios executed with Go's
 | 
						||
builtin benchmark systems. Because of their noisy nature, containers provided by
 | 
						||
Github Actions cannot be reliably used for benchmarking. As a result, you are
 | 
						||
responsible for checking that your changes do not incur a performance penalty.
 | 
						||
You can run their following to execute benchmarks:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
go test ./... -bench=. -count=10
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Benchmark results should be compared against each other with
 | 
						||
[benchstat][benchstat]. Typical flow looks like this:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
1. On the `v2` branch, run `go test ./... -bench=. -count 10` and save output to
 | 
						||
   a file (for example `old.txt`).
 | 
						||
2. Make some code changes.
 | 
						||
3. Run `go test ....` again, and save the output to an other file (for example
 | 
						||
   `new.txt`).
 | 
						||
4. Run `benchstat old.txt new.txt` to check that time/op does not go up in any
 | 
						||
   test.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
On Unix you can use `./ci.sh benchmark -d v2` to verify how your code impacts
 | 
						||
performance.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
It is highly encouraged to add the benchstat results to your pull request
 | 
						||
description. Pull requests that lower performance will receive more scrutiny.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
[benchstat]: https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/perf/cmd/benchstat
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### Style
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Try to look around and follow the same format and structure as the rest of the
 | 
						||
code. We enforce using `go fmt` on the whole code base.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
---
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
## Maintainers-only
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### Merge pull request
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
Checklist:
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
- Passing CI.
 | 
						||
- Does not introduce backward-incompatible changes (unless discussed).
 | 
						||
- Has relevant doc changes.
 | 
						||
- Benchstat does not show performance regression.
 | 
						||
- Pull request is [labeled appropriately][pr-labels].
 | 
						||
- Title will be understandable in the changelog.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
1. Merge using "squash and merge".
 | 
						||
2. Make sure to edit the commit message to keep all the useful information
 | 
						||
   nice and clean.
 | 
						||
3. Make sure the commit title is clear and contains the PR number (#123).
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
### New release
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
1. Decide on the next version number. Use semver.
 | 
						||
2. Generate release notes using [`gh`][gh]. Example:
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
$ gh api -X POST \
 | 
						||
  -F tag_name='v2.0.0-beta.5' \
 | 
						||
  -F target_commitish='v2' \
 | 
						||
  -F previous_tag_name='v2.0.0-beta.4' \
 | 
						||
  --jq '.body' \
 | 
						||
  repos/pelletier/go-toml/releases/generate-notes
 | 
						||
```
 | 
						||
3. Look for "Other changes". That would indicate a pull request not labeled
 | 
						||
   properly. Tweak labels and pull request titles until changelog looks good for
 | 
						||
   users.
 | 
						||
4. [Draft new release][new-release].
 | 
						||
5. Fill tag and target with the same value used to generate the changelog.
 | 
						||
6. Set title to the new tag value.
 | 
						||
7. Paste the generated changelog.
 | 
						||
8. Check "create discussion", in the "Releases" category.
 | 
						||
9. Check pre-release if new version is an alpha or beta.
 | 
						||
 | 
						||
[issues-tracker]: https://github.com/pelletier/go-toml/issues
 | 
						||
[bug-report]: https://github.com/pelletier/go-toml/issues/new?template=bug_report.md
 | 
						||
[pkg.go.dev]: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/pelletier/go-toml
 | 
						||
[readme]: ./README.md
 | 
						||
[fork]: https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo
 | 
						||
[pull-request]: https://help.github.com/en/articles/creating-a-pull-request
 | 
						||
[new-release]: https://github.com/pelletier/go-toml/releases/new
 | 
						||
[gh]: https://github.com/cli/cli
 | 
						||
[pr-labels]: https://github.com/pelletier/go-toml/blob/v2/.github/release.yml
 |